Heads up! New pricing takes effect from November 1st, 2025 onwards.
Learn More
Team DeskDay Team DeskDay
Search is changing its shape. This guide walks you through the best AI search engines to choose in 2026, how they compare on cost, and the features that matter most.
For decades, we typed a few words into a box and dug through blue links like miners panning for gold. Traditional engines like Google and Bing scanned the web and handed us lists of pages to explore.
But the ground has shifted. Today, AI search engines deliver answers already distilled—full sentences, context threaded in, shaped more by how we think than how machines index. The hunt feels less like excavation and more like a conversation.
ChatGPT is an AI-driven search tool that understands your intent and returns clear, human-style explanations in seconds.
ChatGPT in 2026 has moved beyond being just a chatbot — it’s a search companion with memory, context, and conversation. Instead of throwing links at you, it reads, understands, summarizes, and reasons. You ask a question, it brings answers — not pages to sift through. Code, research, product ideas, even troubleshooting steps arrive in natural language, tailored to you. It feels less like searching, more like thinking out loud with someone smart who already knows where to look.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Gives direct, conversational answers | Can be confidently wrong at times |
| Understands context and follow-up questions | May lack the latest real-time information |
| Great for writing, brainstorming, and summarizing | Not a substitute for expert judgment |
| Saves time by condensing research | Needs clear prompts for best results |
| Works across many topics and use cases | May miss nuance without enough context |
| Easy to use with natural language | Requires verification for critical tasks |
| Plan | Price (USD) / Typical Rate | What You Get / Ideal For |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month (OpenAI) | Basic access to ChatGPT features — good for occasional use, casual queries, or to test the platform without commitment. (ChatGPT) |
| Plus | $20 / month (OpenAI) | Faster responses, priority access during peak load, extended usage limits, access to advanced AI models and features — great for frequent users and creators. (OpenAI) |
| Pro | $200 / month (OpenAI) | Full access to all models and features, highest usage limits, best performance — ideal for power users, researchers, developers, and heavy workloads. (OpenAI) |
| Team / Business | $25–30 per user / month (billed yearly or monthly) (OpenAI) | Multi-user collaboration, shared workspace, admin controls, team-level access, suitable for small to medium teams needing AI across users. (Exploding Topics) |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing (depends on scale and requirements) (OpenAI) | Enterprise-grade features: dedicated support, advanced administration, compliance, custom usage levels — best for large organizations. (OpenAI) |
Google AI Mode blends classic Google search with AI summaries, helping you get direct, to-the-point answers faster.
Google’s AI Mode with Gemini in 2026 blends classic search with conversational intelligence. Instead of blue links and long scrolls, Gemini analyzes context, visual content, and real-time data to deliver answers directly — summaries, comparisons, step-by-steps, even generated insights. It learns your intent, adapts to follow-up questions, and feels like Google rebuilt search for dialogue rather than keywords. A familiar giant, now thinking with you instead of just fetching results.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Gives quick, AI-generated summaries for faster answers | Summaries can miss nuance or oversimplify complex topics |
| Blends classic Google search with conversational results | Not all queries trigger AI Mode consistently |
| Great for getting the “big picture” without clicking multiple links | Still relies heavily on Google’s indexing and ranking biases |
| Familiar interface—easy for anyone to use | Limited transparency on how sources are chosen for summaries |
| Works well for everyday questions and comparisons | May provide outdated info if the underlying sources aren’t fresh |
| Saves time by reducing the need to open multiple pages | Accuracy varies—important details still need verification |
AI Mode is free inside Google Search, giving everyone instant access to AI-powered answers. If you need more depth — stronger models, higher usage limits, creative tools, and expanded storage — Google’s Pro and Ultra plans step in with tiered options built for heavier workloads and advanced use cases.
| Plan | Price (USD / Regional) | What’s Included / Who It’s For |
|---|---|---|
| Free / Basic Google AI Mode | Often free (or included with standard Google Account) for basic access | Basic AI-powered search/query results via Google AI Mode — good for conversational search and simple tasks. (blog.google) |
| Google AI Pro | $19.99/month globally / e.g. ₹1,950 INR/month (in India) (Gemini) | Full access to AI tools including Gemini, enhanced model access, 2 TB storage, deeper search and research features, higher usage limits. (Gemini) |
| Google AI Ultra | $249.99/month (in US and supported regions) (TechCrunch) | Highest-tier access: advanced AI models (Deep Think, latest Gemini), video/image generation tools, large storage (30 TB), premium AI features, tools across Google apps. (Gemini) |
Perplexity AI is a conversational search tool that explains answers and shows exactly where the information comes from.
Perplexity in 2026 has become the go-to search engine for people who want answers fast without the noise. It blends web results with AI reasoning, pulling sources side-by-side so you can verify facts instead of trusting blindly. Ask a question and you get concise summaries, citations, related prompts, and deep dives — all in one thread. It feels like research distilled: quick when you’re in a hurry, deep when you need detail.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Gives fast, concise answers with real citations | Can oversimplify complex topics in summaries |
| Blends AI reasoning with real-time web search | Limited depth compared to full research tools |
| Great for quick fact-checking and verification | Source quality varies depending on what’s available online |
| Clean, distraction-free interface | Not ideal for long, multi-step creative tasks |
| Strong at research-style queries and data gathering | Free tier may have usage limits or slower performance |
| Transparent with sources, making it easy to trust | Occasionally provides outdated links or broken citations |
| Plan | Price | What’s Included / Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Free (Standard) | $0 / month (Data Studios ‧Exafin) | Basic AI-search features, standard daily usage limits — good for occasional searches or trying the platform. (Data Studios ‧Exafin) |
| Pro (Individual) | $20 / month or $200 / year (Wise) | Access to advanced AI models, increased search limits, file uploads, image-generation and enhanced tools — ideal for frequent users or researchers. (Perplexity AI) |
| Enterprise Pro (per seat) | $40 / month or $400 / year per user (Perplexity AI) | Team/corporate use — centralized billing and collaboration features, suitable for agencies or companies using Perplexity across multiple users. (Perplexity AI) |
| Max (Individual Premium) | $200 / month or $2,000 / year (Perplexity AI) | Highest tier offering — full access to all features and models, unlimited usage and advanced capabilities (research, attachments, priority performance). (Perplexity AI) |
| API (Search / Research API) | Usage-based: starts around $5 per 1,000 requests (docs.perplexity.ai) | For developers building custom integrations or fetching raw search data — pay-as-you-go model suitable for dynamic workloads. (docs.perplexity.ai) |
Bing AI (Copilot) provides smart, conversational results backed by Microsoft’s latest AI models, making research and everyday tasks easier.
Bing AI (Copilot) in 2026 has found its stride as Microsoft’s conversational gateway to the web. It searches, reasons, cites, and builds — whether you’re asking for market research, planning a trip, or generating code. With deep Windows and Office integration, Copilot slips into daily workflows like an old friend who knows where everything lives. You ask — it drafts, compares, summarizes, and even acts. Search feels less like browsing and more like getting work done.
Pricing
| Plan | Approx. Price | Best For / What You Get |
|---|---|---|
| Copilot Chat (Free) | $0 — included with many Microsoft 365 plans / Entra-enabled accounts (Microsoft Learn) | Basic AI-powered chat and search inside Microsoft ecosystem — good for simple queries, brainstorming, and light tasks (Microsoft Learn) |
| Copilot Pro (Individual) | ~$20 per user/month (TechTarget) | More power: priority access to advanced AI models, deeper features — useful for heavy users, freelancers, creators. (omnimind.ai) |
| Microsoft 365 Copilot (Business/Enterprise) | ~$30 per user/month (requires a qualifying Microsoft 365 license: E3/E5, Business Standard/Premium, etc.) (TechTarget) | Full integration across Office apps, enhanced AI features, business-ready support & compliance — designed for teams and organizations. (rencore.com) |
Claude is a safety-focused AI assistant that excels at clear explanations, long-form reasoning, and complex problem-solving.
Claude in 2026 stands out as the thoughtful search engine — calm, precise, and built for long-form thinking. It doesn’t rush to answer; it understands context, reads entire documents, and offers grounded insights with nuance. Great for research, writing, and complex problem-solving, Claude handles depth like a scholar but responds with clarity and warmth. When you need accuracy without noise, Claude feels like the quiet mind in a loud digital room.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Delivers thoughtful, well-reasoned responses | Can be slower compared to lighter models |
| Strong at long-form reasoning and complex prompts | May feel overly cautious or conservative in tone |
| Good for deep work: analysis, writing, brainstorming, planning | Might underperform for very casual or reactive tasks |
| Focus on safety and ethical output | Sometimes avoids giving direct answers when uncertain |
| Handles structured tasks, context awareness, and follow-up quite well | Resource-intensive — can require more compute or latency |
| Less prone to hallucinations compared to some alternatives | Limited real-time or up-to-date information, depending on training data |
| Plan | Price (USD) | What’s Included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month | Basic access to Claude via web or app — limited daily usage, suitable for casual use or light tasks. (Data Studios ‧Exafin) |
| Pro | ~$20 / month (or ~$17/month if billed annually) (claude.com) | Increased usage limits, access to advanced Claude models, faster responses, more reliability during peak times, early access to new features. (Pluralsight) |
| Team | ~$25–30 per user / month (minimum 5 users) (PromptLayer) | All Pro features + collaboration tools, shared billing, team-level access — useful for small/medium teams working together. (PromptLayer) |
| Max | From ~$100 up to ~$200 per user / month, depending on usage level (claude.com) | Significantly higher usage limits, priority access, memory capabilities, advanced features — suited for heavy users, power workloads, deep research or development tasks. (claude.com) |
Sigma Chat, formerly Bagoodex, is a refreshed AI chat platform with a new identity and improved features for faster, smarter conversations.
Sigma Chat, formerly Bagoodex, arrives in 2026 as a rising name in AI-driven search. It blends conversational responses with real-time web intelligence, making queries feel like discussions rather than commands. Lightweight, fast, and community-focused, Sigma Chat appeals to power users who love flexibility — from summarizing research to pulling fresh results with minimal friction. It’s not just another search tool; it’s a nimble alternative built for users who want speed without losing depth.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Free access via built-in browser — no cost barrier to start using AI chat and search. (sigmabrowser.com) | Interface and presentation sometimes feel rough — visual output (e.g. images or generic placeholders) can be weak or not well-formatted. (Backlinko) |
| Combines web search + AI chat: you get answers + context + citation-style sourcing. (AIxploria) | Results may oversimplify complex topics; depth and nuance can be lacking. (futurepedia) |
| Handles a wide variety of tasks — from content generation and summarization to coding help, research, and brainstorming. (Powerusers AI) | Limited integrations or external tool support — harder to embed deeply into custom workflows compared to more mature platforms. (futurepedia) |
| Multilingual support and privacy-focused usage, making it accessible globally and useful for privacy-conscious users. (futurepedia) | For shopping/commercial queries: no built-in pricing or direct purchase links. Less useful if you want ready-to-buy options. (Backlinko) |
| Great for iterative research: it remembers context across follow-up questions, which helps for in-depth or multi-part queries. (Backlinko) | Not ideal for very long or highly specialized tasks — performance and accuracy may drop when digging deep or handling domain-heavy topics. (futurepedia) |
Pricing
| Plan | Price | What’s Included / Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month (Sigma Browser) | Basic AI-chat and search — a good entry point to test features, get simple answers, and use chat-powered search without commitment. (Sigma Browser) |
| SigmaChat Plus | $10 / month (Backlinko) | Extended access beyond free-tier limits, presumably more generous usage quotas or priority access. (Backlinko) |
| SigmaChat Pro | $75 / month (Backlinko) | Full/nearly unlimited access — ideal for heavy users, researchers, content creators needing consistent AI-powered chat and search. (Backlinko) |
Brave Search with Leo blends privacy-first search with AI-powered summaries, giving fast answers without tracking your data.
Brave Search with Leo AI in 2026 champions privacy without sacrificing intelligence. It delivers answers without tracking you, and Leo steps in to summarize pages, explain concepts, draft content, or refine searches through natural conversation. The engine’s independent index gives results that feel original rather than recycled, and with AI layered on top, research becomes cleaner, safer, and refreshingly ad-free. It’s search for users who value both brains and boundaries.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong privacy protections: no tracking, blocking of ads/trackers, and minimal data collection. (Brave) | Because the index is smaller than giants like Google, it may struggle with long-tail or obscure queries. (Wikipedia) |
| AI-powered answers and summaries: Leo can synthesize information from multiple sources, giving fast, consolidated responses. (Brave) | Output quality can be hit or miss: some responses may be brief, lack depth, or feel overly simplified. (Brave Community) |
| Easy to use — built right into the browser/search engine, no extra setup required. (Wikipedia) | Because of aggressive privacy and blocking rules, some websites or interactive services may behave oddly or break. (GeeksforGeeks) |
| Fast, clean browsing thanks to ad-blocking and minimal tracking overhead. (10Web) | As with any AI-powered search assistant, answers should be verified; Leo can still produce mistakes or outdated information. (Brave) |
| Good for general research, quick summaries, browsing with privacy and simplicity — ideal for casual users or privacy-conscious people. (Brave) | For deep, niche research or specialized technical topics, Leo’s summarization may fall short compared to dedicated research or domain-specific tools. (Brave Community) |
| Plan | Price | What You Get |
|---|---|---|
| Free (Leo Basic) | $0 | Built-in AI assistant in the browser — summarize pages, get quick answers, translate, generate content, and more. Rate-limited, but fully usable. (Brave) |
| Leo Premium | $14.99 / month (or $149.99 / year) (Brave) | Higher rate limits, access to more advanced LLMs (better models), faster responses, priority access during peak traffic, early access to new features. (Brave) |
You.com is an AI-powered search engine that blends web results with conversational answers, giving you information in a more flexible, intuitive way.
You.com in 2026 feels like a workspace disguised as a search engine. Instead of just returning results, it lets you chat, generate content, search apps, run AI tools, and pull answers — all in one screen. Research, writing, coding, and browsing blend together through customizable AI modes, giving users more control over how information appears. It’s built for multitaskers who want to search, create, and act without switching tabs.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Offers privacy-focused search — no tracking, optional “private mode,” and minimal personal data collection. (Analytics Vidhya) | Results can be less comprehensive than larger search engines, so obscure or niche queries may return weaker results. (Rean Linux) |
| Provides AI-powered summaries and conversational search (via YouChat), making answers faster and easier to digest than traditional link lists. (Wikipedia) | Free tier has usage limits and may feel basic; advanced features require subscription. (AI Detect Plus) |
| Allows customization — you can tailor search preferences to your needs and filter out irrelevant content. (G2) | Because the engine is newer and smaller, coverage isn’t as broad as giants like Google or Bing. (Rean Linux) |
| Combines traditional search with built-in AI tools for tasks like writing, coding, summarizing — making it a productivity-oriented platform. (azariangrowthagency.com) | For very heavy research or specialized deep-dive needs, AI-summaries may miss nuance; original sources should still be checked. (data4ai.com) |
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Included Features / Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month (you.com) | Basic AI-powered search and chat, real-time web answers, limited queries — useful for casual users or those wanting to try before committing. (you.com) |
| Pro (YouPro) | ~$20 / month (billed annually) (you.com) | Access to advanced AI models (like GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet), file uploads/GDrive integration (up to ~25 MB per query), custom agents and research tools, larger context window. Good for regular users, creators, or frequent search/chat tasks. (you.com) |
| Max | ~$200 / month (billed annually) (you.com) | Includes all Pro features + support for up to 25 collaborators, unlimited ARI reports, higher file-upload quotas (e.g. 50 MB per query), large context window, priority support — suited for teams, heavy researchers, or power users. (you.com) |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing (contact sales) (you.com) | Enterprise-grade features: team collaboration, analytics/reporting, secure private-data integration (Private RAG), custom access permissions — best for businesses needing scalable, secure, full-featured AI tools. (you.com) |
DuckDuckGo brings its privacy-first mindset to AI. You get ChatGPT-style answers without surrendering your personal data. It’s the quiet, sturdy option for anyone who prefers their searches to stay theirs.
DuckDuckGo AI Chat/Search in 2026 holds tight to its promise — privacy first, answers next. It introduces AI convenience without the tracking, offering quick summaries, conversational responses, and web results that respect your anonymity. No profiles, no data trails, just clean search paired with lightweight AI reasoning. For users who want smart help without feeling watched, DuckDuckGo remains the quiet, trust-worthy choice.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong privacy — doesn’t track your IP, doesn’t store search history or personal data. (michigan.it.umich.edu) | Uses daily-usage limits, which can feel restrictive if you rely heavily on it. (Tencent RTC) |
| No registration or account needed — you can use it anonymously and easily. (michigan.it.umich.edu) | Lacks long-term memory or personalized history — conversations aren’t saved to the cloud. (Tencent RTC) |
| Offers AI-powered answers, summaries, and chat via multiple underlying models for flexibility. (TechRadar) | Since it anonymizes requests, answer quality may vary; you might get less consistency than subscription-based tools. (Tencent RTC) |
| Integrates privacy and AI in one package — browsing/search and AI-chat in a privacy-first environment. (Ghostery) | Because it focuses on privacy and anonymity, it may lack advanced features like personalized learning, long-term context, or deep integrations. (Tencent RTC) |
| Good for quick research, brainstorming, or casual questions when you want simplicity without logging in. (michigan.it.umich.edu) | Not ideal for heavy-duty research or professional-grade work — as with many AI tools, responses should be taken cautiously and verified. (TechRadar) |
Pricing
| Plan / Tier | Price | What’s Included / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free / Basic | $0 / month | Access to AI-chat features with certain models (e.g. older or lighter models), basic usage limits, full anonymity, no account needed. (DuckDuckGo) |
| Subscription (Full AI + Extras) | $9.99 USD / month or $99 USD / year (Spread Privacy) | Access to advanced AI models (like GPT-4o, GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 4, etc.), faster/greater usage limits, integrated privacy tools (VPN, identity-protection, personal info removal), and enhanced chat experience. (TechCrunch) |
Kagi feels crafted. It uses a paid model to eliminate ads and focuses on high-quality sources. Its “Lens” system lets you surface only the kinds of results you actually want. It’s search for the discerning mind.
Kagi Search in 2026 has carved out a niche for those who believe quality beats volume. With its paid, tracker-free model, Kagi filters out noise, spam, and SEO clutter to deliver clean, relevant results that feel hand-picked rather than harvested. Its AI assistant refines queries, summarizes sources, and surfaces trusted information fast — perfect for researchers, writers, and anyone who values time over ads. It’s search designed for thinkers, not click counts.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Ad-free and privacy-focused: no tracking, no ads, and no selling your clicks. (kagi.com) | It’s a paid service — free only for a limited trial or low-volume use, so cost may feel steep for casual searchers. (Wikipedia) |
| Highly customizable results: you can block or boost domains, create “lenses” to filter results by type (forums, blogs, PDFs, etc.), and tailor search to your preferences. (blog.kagi.com) | Smaller index and more curated results — might miss some obscure or niche content that larger engines with broader indexes (like Google) might still surface. (Nieman Lab) |
| Cleaner, distraction-free results with less SEO/spam clutter and better focus on quality content over ads or clickbait. (Techaeris) | Subscription model may be hard to justify if your search needs are light or infrequent. (Techlore Forum) |
| Built-in features for power users: AI summaries/“Quick Answers,” custom filters, domain/ranker controls, and privacy-first design make it useful for research, devs, writers, or knowledge work. (kagi.com) | Learning curve: to get the most out of customization (lenses, domain control, filters) requires some time and manual configuration — not ideal for casual or one-off users. (FlatFootFox) |
| Incentive alignment: because users pay directly (not clicks/ad revenue), there’s less incentive to show ads, track behavior, or favor clickbait — search quality depends on actual usefulness. (blog.kagi.com) | May lack certain specialised search features (e.g. product search, retail filters, e-commerce deals) that big ad-supported engines sometimes surface better. (MPU Talk) |
Pricing
| Plan | Price (USD / month) | What You Get / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free / Trial | $0 | Limited to 100 searches total to try out the engine. (Wikipedia) |
| Starter | $5 / month | ~300 searches per month. Good if you search occasionally or want to test paid search without a big commitment. (Kagi Help) |
| Professional | $10 / month | Unlimited searches, full access to AI-powered tools (summarizer, assistant, “lenses” and search filters) and privacy-first, ad-free search. (kagi.com) |
| Ultimate | $25 / month | All Professional features plus highest-level access — full AI assistant (premium models), maximum limits, and advanced features for heavy users or researchers. (Kagi Help) |
| Family / Duo / Team Plans | Varies (e.g. Duo: $14/mo for 2 users; Family up to 6 users: ~$20/mo) (kagi.com) | Shared access — multiple users get unlimited or upgraded search under one plan, with options to upgrade members individually. (kagi.com) |
iAsk specializes in turning scattered information into tidy, structured responses. It works well for practical questions—guides, comparisons, clear explanations—without burying you in unnecessary detail.
iAsk in 2026 positions itself as a conversational research tool that blends AI answers with real-time web data. Instead of giving passive links, it analyzes context and forms direct responses, letting you ask follow-ups naturally like a chat. With a clean interface and a focus on quick, digestible information, iAsk appeals to users who want clear answers fast, without wading through pages of text.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Delivers quick, AI-powered answers in natural language — ideal for fast info gathering and simple questions. (Ask AI) | Lacks some advanced features found in other AI platforms — limits on customization, conversational history, and pro-level tools. (G2) |
| Easy to use — clean UI and intuitive interface make it accessible even to users with minimal technical background. (G2) | Contextual depth may suffer — for complex or nuanced topics, iAsk.ai sometimes returns overly simplistic answers. (G2) |
| Offers a free tier, making it accessible to anyone without upfront cost — good for casual or occasional use. (Ask AI) | Premium features or heavier usage may feel pricey relative to the basic offering, especially for frequent users. (G2) |
| Useful for a variety of tasks — from quick research or fact-checking to simple writing, summarizing or homework help. (AI Tools) | Not the best choice for deep research or expert-level detail — reliance on underlying data sources means accuracy can vary. (Merlio) |
| Good for students, casual users, and general information retrieval — especially when ease and speed matter more than depth. (Ask AI) | Limited integration with external tools or workflows, which may make it less suitable for advanced or enterprise use cases. (Anakin.ai) |
Pricing
| Plan / Tier | Price | What’s Included / Who It Fits |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month (toolinsidr.com) | Basic AI-powered search and answers, summarizer, content-generation features. Good for casual users, students, or trial use. (Powerusers AI) |
| Pro (iAsk Pro) | $9.95 / month (toolsforhumans.ai) | Removes ads, unlocks advanced reasoning, allows document uploads, enables image generation, offers an ad-free experience and priority support — suitable for frequent users, researchers, or power users. (toolinsidr.com) |
| API / Developer-Usage | $1.20 per 1,000 responses (Basic model) / $6 per 1,000 responses (Regular model) / $12 per 1,000 responses (Advanced model) (Ask AI) | For developers and businesses building integrations, automations or custom projects using iAsk’s answer engine — pay-as-you-go pricing. (Ask AI) |
Komo AI is a fast and privacy-friendly search tool that blends AI-powered responses with clean, ad-free search results.
Komo AI in 2026 stands as the search engine for creators, builders, and curious minds. It blends conversational AI with community-driven discovery, surfacing insights, summaries, and creative outputs in seconds. Whether you’re researching, brainstorming content, or exploring niche topics, Komo delivers focused answers without the clutter — search that feels fresh, fast, and delightfully human.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Ad-free, privacy-focused AI search with no tracking or ads. (waytoagi.com) | Answers can sometimes lack depth or nuance, especially on complex or specialized topics. (Zapier) |
| Offers multiple search modes — Ask, Research, Explore — letting you tailor how you search depending on your needs. (aireviewguys.com) | Compared with larger AI/search engines, it may perform weaker on accuracy and consistency for heavy research tasks. (toolsforhumans.ai) |
| Provides a clean, minimal interface and interactive search experience (chat, summaries, dynamic exploration) — useful for brainstorming, quick lookups, or exploratory research. (Medium) | Some features and advanced model access only unlocked on paid plans; free tier has limitations. (Siteefy) |
| Supports multiple AI models and lets you choose how the AI responds, giving flexibility depending on your task (summary, deep dive, explanation, etc.). (wiki.komo.ai) | For very serious or critical tasks — like technical research or compliance-sensitive work — you may need to verify results independently due to potential inconsistencies. (aireviewguys.com) |
| Good balance for casual users, students, or professionals needing quick, private searches or initial research without clutter or ads. (DemandSage) | Interface and experience still evolving — occasional bugs or rough edges reported in user reviews. (Zapier) |
Pricing
| Plan | Price (USD / month) | What’s Included / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Basic AI-powered search and chat — useful for casual use or light queries. (videosdk.live) |
| Basic | ~$15 / month (AIChief) | Extended AI search capabilities — good for users who need more reliability and search volume than the free tier allows. (AIChief) |
| Premium | ~$30 / month (Tools for Humans) | Access to enhanced models, deeper search & research tools, higher usage limits, and full feature set for heavy users. (AIChief) |
| Business / Enterprise | Custom pricing (contact sales) (Tools for Humans) | Designed for team or enterprise-level usage: higher quotas, advanced features, integrations, or bulk licensing. (Tools for Humans) |
Arc Search turns browsing into a guided exploration — it uses AI to scan the web for you, summarize key findings, and deliver a narrative instead of a page full of links.
Arc AI Search in 2026 feels like the search engine built for explorers. Instead of static results, Arc turns each query into a visual journey — pulling pages, summaries, references, and context into an elegant workspace where research flows instead of fragments. It’s fast, minimal, and designed for people who think by browsing. For students, analysts, and deep divers, Arc AI makes the web feel organized again, one search at a time.
| Pros | Cons / Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Offers a fresh browsing model — vertical sidebar tabs, “Spaces”, split-screen tabs, and built-in ad/tracker blocking for a cleaner, more organized web experience. (Computerworld) | Because of its unique design model, there’s a learning curve — the interface can feel unfamiliar at first. (TechPP) |
| Designed for productivity: easy multitasking, tab/folder organization, workspace separation (e.g. work vs personal), and helpful tab management features. (Xander Jake) | Built on Chromium — same as many mainstream browsers — so memory and resource usage can still be heavy if many tabs are open. (Medium) |
| Built-in ad blocking and privacy-friendly defaults, reducing clutter and tracking compared to standard browsers. (TechPP) | Feature-parity across platforms is inconsistent: some versions (especially mobile) may lack certain desktop features. (Efficient) |
| Offers additional tools beyond browsing — layout customizations, tab archiving, media controls, and interface tweaks that resonate for productivity and clarity. (Molodtsov) | Some users report occasional stability problems — crashes, sync issues on certain platforms, or subtle bugs with features like tab-archiving or extension behavior. (DEV Community) |
Pricing
| Plan / Tier | Price / Cost | What’s Included / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free / Standard | $0 — free to use | Core features: AI-enabled search (“Browse For Me”), built-in ad/tracker blocking, tab auto-archive, reader mode, basic browsing and search functionality. (AIChief) |
| Premium / Paid (Future-potential) | Not publicly defined — no official price announced yet | The company mentions potential premium or team-oriented features in the future. As of now (2025) there’s no published paid plan for Arc Search. (Arc Help Center) |
Andi is an AI search assistant that delivers direct, conversational answers and smart summaries instead of long lists of links.
Andi in 2026 feels like search with a pulse — fast, visual, and made for people who think in snippets rather than long scrolls. Instead of traditional links, Andi responds conversationally, showing sources, summaries, and bite-sized insights in a clean card-style layout. It’s ideal for quick answers, trends, and everyday queries, delivering clarity without the usual search clutter.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Gives direct, conversational answers instead of long lists of links — like chatting with a friend. (10Web) | As a newer tool, sometimes results can lack depth or miss nuanced context. (aireviewguys.com) |
| Fast summaries and clear, easy-to-read responses — saves time versus digging through multiple pages. (ToolsWorld) | Limited customization: fewer advanced options for power users compared to full research or developer-oriented tools. (10Web) |
| Privacy- and ad-free: offers a cleaner, less cluttered alternative to traditional search engines. (Search Engine Journal) | May struggle with very specialized, technical, or in-depth queries — accuracy can dip when topics get complex. (aireviewguys.com) |
| Simple interface — user-friendly and accessible even for casual users or quick searches. (ToolsWorld) | Still evolving: occasional rough edges and fewer integrations compared with more mature platforms. (aireviewguys.com) |
Pricing
| Plan / Tier | Price | What’s Included / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month (andi.co) | Core AI-powered search with conversational answers, ad-free and privacy-focused — good for casual use and basic queries. (OpenAI Agent) |
| Planned Premium Tier (“Andi Plus” / future upgrade) | Not yet published (waitlist) (andi.co) | Intended to include advanced features — likely extended usage, better model access or integrations — details to be announced. (andi.co) |
Phind is an AI-powered search tool built for developers — it understands code, reads documentation, and gives answers that speak your language.
Phind in 2026 has become a favorite for developers and technical learners. Ask it a coding question or error, and it doesn’t just answer — it explains, compares approaches, and often generates working code on the spot. With deep model reasoning and direct search over documentation, GitHub threads, and technical blogs, Phind feels like a senior engineer sitting beside you. Quick, accurate, and built for builders — it turns problem-solving into progress.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Specialized for developers — understands code, reads documentation, and gives answers in programming context. | Focus on coding and technical subjects means less value for non-developer queries (general info, creative writing, etc.). |
| Retrieves relevant examples, snippets, and links — helps you solve bugs and learn patterns quickly. | Sometimes may misinterpret ambiguous code or lack the latest context from evolving frameworks or libraries. |
| Speeds up research — cuts down time spent digging through docs, StackOverflow, and search results. | For very new or niche libraries, data may be incomplete or outdated — requires verifying with official docs. |
| Great for debugging, learning, and quick experimentation — handy for solo devs and teams alike. | Not ideal if you want deep explanations, conceptual learning, or non-coding tasks like brainstorming or content creation. |
| Offers fast, precise, technical responses rather than general-language summaries — efficient and developer-focused. | As with any AI, context is limited — sometimes misses nuances, edge-cases, or project-specific constraints. |
Pricing
| Plan | Price | What’s Included / Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month (Top AI Tools List – OpenTools) | Basic AI-powered search (Phind-70B) with limited daily uses — good for occasional queries or testing the tool. (Genspark) |
| Pro (Monthly) | $20 / month (AI Tools) | Unlimited powerful Phind-70B searches, daily access to top-tier models (GPT-4o, Claude, etc.), image analysis, multi-query mode, large context window (up to 32 K tokens), and features like in-browser code analysis/testing. (phindai.com) |
| Pro (Yearly) | ≈ $17 / month (billed annually) (phindai.com) | Same benefits as monthly Pro plan, with cost savings when billed yearly. (Tools for Humans) |
| Business / Team | ≈ $40 / month per user (phindai.com) | All Pro features + business-grade settings: central billing, optional data-training exclusion, team/user management — suited for organizations or teams using Phind across multiple users. (phindai.com) |
Felo combines real-time web access with natural language responses. It’s smooth and fast, ideal for everyday tasks where you want just enough context to move forward.
Felo in 2026 has grown into a lightweight yet clever AI search companion. It delivers fast, conversational answers backed by web context, making everyday queries feel effortless. With a clean interface and quick response flow, Felo shines for users who want information distilled into simple, useful takeaways without digging through endless links. It’s search made friendly — sharp, direct, and easy to trust.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supports multilingual search and cross-language information retrieval — you can search in your native language and get valid global results. (Felo) | As with many AI-powered tools, answers may sometimes be simplified and require manual verification for accuracy. (Felo) |
| Offers more than traditional search: web search, academic-paper search, real-time info, and support for documents/PDFs — good for research, learning, and global knowledge gathering. (Felo) | Advanced features (like deep research, heavy usage, full document access) require paid subscription. (FindMyAITool.io) |
| Ability to provide clear summaries and citations — helps avoid sifting through many pages when you only need the core answer. (Felo) | For very specialized or niche technical topics, content may be limited or translation/summary may lose nuance — best used as a starting point rather than final authority. (ai-stars) |
| Built-in tools beyond just search — e.g. mind maps, AI-generated presentations/slides, knowledge-collection & organization features, useful for students, writers, and researchers. (Felo) | For intensive workflows (frequent research, heavy generation), performance might vary; free tier likely has usage or model-access limits. (FindMyAITool.io) |
| Easy to use for casual or multilingual users — no need for precise keywords; natural-language queries work well. (Felo) | As with many AI search engines, results must be cross-checked — overreliance without verification can lead to misinformation or inaccuracy. (Felo) |
Pricing
| Plan / Tier | Price (USD / month) | What’s Included / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free / Standard | $0 | Unlimited high-speed searches + up to 5 “professional searches” per day — useful for casual queries and occasional use. (Felo) |
| Pro (Professional) | $14.99 / month (≈ ¥2099 JPY) (Felo) | Around 300 professional searches/day, access to advanced AI models (e.g. GPT-4o / Claude 3.5-Sonnet), deeper answer exploration, AI-writing/chat features, AI-powered presentations. (Felo) |
EXA treats the web like a living graph. It finds sources that traditional engines overlook and surfaces deep, niche content. Researchers and information hunters love it for the treasures it digs up.
EXA in 2026 stands out with one simple intention — find information at its source. Instead of summaries alone, EXA excels at retrieving original research, papers, code repositories, and deep web content with precision. It’s built for analysts, researchers, and engineers who care about primary data, not recycled SEO pages. With AI layered on top, EXA turns exploration into a streamlined hunt for truth, facts, and the documents that matter.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Designed for AI-driven search: Exa uses semantic/embeddings-based and neural search rather than just keyword matching — delivering results that better reflect meaning and context. (docs.exa.ai) | Requires technical know-how to fully leverage advanced capabilities (like content parsing, custom filtering, or API integration) — may feel heavy for casual users. |
| Provides full, clean webpage content and parsed HTML (not just snippets or link previews) — useful for deep content analysis, summarization, or feeding into AI agents. (docs.exa.ai) | Because it’s built for large-scale and AI-driven search workflows, it can be resource-intensive and may incur higher costs or complexity when used at scale. (10Web) |
| Supports powerful filtering — domain, location, semantic category, date range, etc. — which helps narrow down results to exactly what you need. (Exa) | For highly specialized or niche queries, results depend heavily on what’s available on the web — like any search engine, Exa can’t create information out of thin air. |
| Offers API + developer-friendly tools: Search, content retrieval, similarity search, and “answer” endpoints — great for building apps, research stacks, or AI agents on top of real web data. (Exa) | Using Exa effectively may require setup, prompt tuning, or development work. It isn’t as plug-and-play as standard web search for non-technical users. |
| Real-time or frequently updated index: good for retrieving up-to-date information — useful for research, competitive analysis, or fast-moving topics. (10Web) | For casual or occasional users, the complexity and advanced nature of Exa might be overkill compared to simpler AI-search tools or conventional search engines. |
Pricing
| Plan / Model | Price / Rate | What You Get / When It Applies |
|---|---|---|
| Pay-as-you-go (API-based) | • $5 per 1,000 searches (for 1–25 results) • $25 per 1,000 searches (for 26–100 results) • $1 per 1,000 pages for content retrieval (text / snippets / summaries) • $5 per 1,000 “answers” with citations • Research: $5 per 1,000 searches, $5 per 1,000 page-reads (or $10 in the “pro-research” mode), plus $5 per 1 million reasoning tokens (exa.ai) | Flexible usage — pay only for what you use. Useful when demand is variable or for integrations/automation. |
| Subscription: Websets Starter | $49 / month | Includes 8,000 credits, 100 results per Webset, 2 seats, 2 concurrent searches, and enrichment features. Good for small teams or light consistent use. (exa.ai) |
| Subscription: Websets Pro | $449 / month | 100,000 credits, up to 1,000 results per Webset, 10 seats, 5 concurrent searches, richer enrichment capabilities — suited for heavy usage, bigger teams, or enterprise workflows. (exa.ai) |
| Enterprise / Custom Plan | Custom pricing (contact Exa) | For high-volume needs, custom rate limits, advanced features, enterprise-grade support, and tailored data-security requirements. (exa.ai) |
DeepSeek is an AI-powered search tool designed to give you clear, context-aware results and clean summaries — making research easier and faster.
DeepSeek in 2026 has become the search engine you call on when you need raw power and serious reasoning. It handles big questions and technical problems without blinking, generating step-by-step logic, math breakdowns, and well-thought-out explanations instead of surface-level answers. Built for deep research, coding, and analytical thinking, DeepSeek feels less like a search box and more like a sharp mind working beside you — fast, focused, and fiercely capable.
| Pros | Cons / Risks |
|---|---|
| Strong performance on technical and structured tasks (coding, math, logic, data analysis). Benchmarks show high accuracy on math and reasoning tasks. (DataCamp) | Quality and safety concerns: independent evaluations found security and privacy issues, especially when dealing with politically or culturally sensitive content. (NIST) |
| Open-source and cost-efficient: lower resource requirements and more affordable token pricing than many closed-source models — useful for developers and businesses on budget. (10Web) | Limited nuance and creativity: compared to more expansive models, DeepSeek can lag in creative tasks, multimodal output, or tasks requiring deep contextual understanding. (ResearchGate) |
| Good for structured outputs — well-suited for code generation, documentation, data analysis, quick summarization, and logical tasks. (Second Talent) | Possible bias and censorship: reports show content suppression or biased outputs on politically sensitive topics due to model constraints or moderation rules. (Wikipedia) |
| Offers flexibility: because of its open-source nature, users/developers can self-host, audit, or fine-tune the model to their needs (useful for research, enterprise use, or custom use-cases). (REVE Chat) | Security & compliance concerns, especially for sensitive or regulated workloads — using DeepSeek might pose data privacy or regulatory risks depending on jurisdiction and use-case. (Wikipedia) |
Pricing
| Plan / Model | Price / Cost | What You Get / When It Applies |
|---|---|---|
| Chat / Free Mode | $0 — free for users via web/app (BytePlus) | Full conversational AI access via DeepSeek Chat — good for personal use, experimentation, casual queries without any cost. (Wikipedia) |
| API / Pay-as-You-Go | • Approx. US$0.028 per 1M input tokens (cache-hit) • US$0.28 per 1M input tokens (cache-miss) • US$0.42 per 1M output tokens (api-docs.deepseek.com) | Usage-based token billing — used when integrating DeepSeek via API (apps, scripts, enterprise workflows). Charges depend on how much text you send/receive. |
| (Optional / Developer-Only) | — | You top-up account balance or pay-per-use — no fixed monthly subscription needed; cost varies with usage volume. (api-docs.deepseek.com) |
Opera Search with Aria AI blends AI-powered results with your everyday browsing — giving you quick, conversational answers while you surf the web.
Opera Search with Aria AI in 2026 feels like browsing with a co-pilot, not a search bar. Aria reads pages as you open them, summarizes long content, helps compare information, and answers questions without sending you down link rabbit holes. Built right into the browser, it turns everyday browsing into a guided experience — faster reads, quicker decisions, and less tab chaos. A familiar browser, now with a mind of its own.
| Pros | Cons / Trade-offs |
|---|---|
| AI built in — no add-ons or extra installs needed; Aria is part of Opera by default. (opera.com) | Because it’s a general-purpose AI tied to public web data, its answers can sometimes be generic or require verification. (eesel AI) |
| Real-time web access + up-to-date information, plus features like summarization, image generation, page-context summaries, writing help. (opera.com) | For advanced tasks (e.g. enterprise-grade workflows), it lacks customization, integrations, or private-data support — not built for heavy business use. (eesel AI) |
| Built-in privacy & browser tools — Ad Blocker, free VPN, tracker protections, so AI browsing stays within a safer, cleaner environment. (BrowserStack) | As a browser-based AI, user data or prompts may still go through external LLM services (depending on configuration), making it less ideal for highly sensitive content. (eesel AI) |
| Quick workflow boosts — you can ask questions, summarize pages, draft content, or generate images without leaving the browser or switching tools. (opera.com) | Outputs may sometimes lack the depth or precision of specialized or professional-grade AI tools, especially for niche or highly technical topics. (eesel AI) |
| Totally free for users — no paywalls, subscriptions or extra cost to access basic AI and browsing features. (SentiSight.ai) | Since it’s a general solution, not tailored for businesses or teams, it doesn’t support custom workflows, integrations, or internal knowledge bases you’d expect in enterprise AI tools. (eesel AI) |
Pricing
| Tier / Version | Price / Cost | What You Get |
|---|---|---|
| Free / Standard Opera (desktop and mobile) | ₹0 / $0 — free to use (opera.com) | Aria built-in: AI-powered search & chat, web-access answers, text/image generation, page summarization, tab-management, language tools — no login needed (opera.com) |
| Premium AI-enhanced browser (Opera Neon — includes advanced AI agent features) | ~$19.90 / month (Engadget) | “Agentic” AI: ability to auto-browse, run tasks, form-filling, advanced AI workflows beyond just search—targeted at power users (Engadget) |
Built by xAI, Grok delivers search, chat, and content generation — from fresh news and trending topics to code and creative writing — with direct access to live information streams.
xAI’s Grok Search in 2026 carries the rebellious spirit it was born with — fast, witty, and unfiltered. Instead of polished answers, Grok leans into real-time data and open web indexing, pulling insights from live conversations, social platforms, and trending content as it happens. It responds like a sharp friend who tells you what’s actually going on, not just what’s safe to say. For those who want raw info, instant context, and a little attitude, Grok Search stands apart as the bold voice in a world of careful AI engines.
| Pros | Cons / Risks |
|---|---|
| Provides real-time information from the web and social feeds — useful for news, trending content, and fresh data. (Built In) | Because it draws from live web/social-media content, it can pick up and repeat misinformation, bias, or extreme content. (WIRED) |
| Offers a lively, conversational, and often humorous tone — sometimes more “human” or edgy than traditional AI assistants. (McNeece Web Design) | That edgy style can backfire: responses may be offensive, insensitive, or inappropriate — not ideal for serious or sensitive contexts. (Wikipedia) |
| Good for quick research, casual queries, or general-purpose use where speed and freshness matter more than perfection. (Undetectable AI) | Accuracy and reliability are inconsistent: hallucinations, wrong citations or broken links have been noted. (cjr.org) |
| Helpful for code, reasoning, or technical queries when the model performs well on logic or data-driven tasks. (TopDevelopers) | Not ideal for delicate topics — such as mental health, political/social sensitivity — since tone and content moderation may be weak. (Forbes) |
Pricing
| Plan / Tier | Price (USD / Typical Rate) | What You Get / Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free / Basic | $0 — free tier | Access to Grok (older or baseline models), ability to send a limited number of messages or prompts (e.g. 10 prompts per 2 hours when used via social platform), basic AI-chat & search functionality. (www.ndtv.com) |
| SuperGrok | ≈ $30 / month (≈ $300 / year) (Data Studios ‧Exafin) | Full access to Grok’s main models (including “Grok-4”), higher usage limits, larger context/memory window in conversations, and premium features vs free tier. (Data Studios ‧Exafin) |
| “Heavy” / Premium-heavy (advanced/enterprise-style) | ≈ $300 / month (Fritz ai) | Intended for heavy users: access to top-tier “heavy” models, expanded quotas / high-capacity usage, extended features — for deep research, development work, or demanding workloads. (Fritz ai) |
| Via Social Platform subscription (when integrated with X / formerly Twitter) | Varies by region (historically tied to user subscriptions on the platform) (GrowthShala) | Alternative access path to Grok using the social platform subscription model with access tied to that platform’s premium plan. (Built In) |
The Road Ahead
Search is no longer just a doorway; it’s becoming a companion—one that reads, reasons, summarizes, and guides. Each of these engines carries its own temperament: some quiet, some curious, some built for speed, others for depth.
But all of them share one simple idea:
finding information shouldn’t feel like work.
Get exclusive content on the MSP industry and become a part of the DeskDay community.
