Heads up! New pricing takes effect from November 1st, 2025 onwards.
Learn More
The MSPs winning in 2026 are not the ones with the most tools; they are the ones with the most aligned stack. Your RMM, PSA, documentation, security, and BDR choices now decide how profitably you can scale, how fast your team can respond, and how confidently you can sell outcomes instead of hours.
This guide pulls together 100 of the most important MSP tools across eight core layers of the stack. For each category, you can map tools by pricing band (entry, mid, enterprise) and by the MSP segment they fit best (small, mid‑market, or large/MSSP), so you can design a stack that matches where your business is today, and where you want it to be.
Tool choice is only half the story; pricing models and ideal fit are the other half. Many MSP platforms use one of three basic pricing models: per‑technician, per‑endpoint, or per‑user, sometimes blended with usage‑based or committed‑spend components. Each model pushes your margins and scalability in a different direction.
To keep this guide actionable, use three simple axes as you skim each section:
RMM is the nervous system of your MSP; every proactive intervention you make starts with monitoring, patching, or remote access. The right RMM lets your techs manage thousands of endpoints as easily as hundreds, automate tedious maintenance, and surface issues before clients ever notice. The wrong one locks you into manual work, weak reporting, and fragile scripts.
When assessing RMM tools, look first at the pricing model (per‑endpoint vs per‑technician), automation depth, and ecosystem fit. Per‑endpoint tools can align closer to value when you have dense device estates; per‑tech pricing can be more attractive while you’re small, but can flip as you scale. Consider also how tightly the RMM integrates with your PSA, ticketing, backup, and security stack to avoid swivel‑chair work.
| Tool | Indicative pricing & model | Typical MSP segment |
| NinjaOne | M, mainly per‑endpoint with volume discounts | S–M MSPs wanting cloud‑first RMM |
| Atera | E–M, per‑technician plans for MSPs | S MSPs and internal IT needing all‑in‑one RMM+PSA |
| SuperOps RMM | M, bundled with PSA per‑tech | S–M MSPs modernizing stack |
| Datto RMM | M, per‑endpoint, quote‑based | M MSPs, often Datto‑centric stacks |
| ConnectWise Automate | M–Ent, per‑endpoint, quote‑based | M–L MSPs needing heavy automation |
| N‑able N‑central | M–Ent, per‑endpoint, partner quotes | M–L MSPs with complex networks |
| Kaseya VSA | M–Ent, per‑endpoint bundles | M–L MSPs in the Kaseya ecosystem |
| Pulseway | E–M, per‑endpoint and per‑user SaaS | S MSPs, mobile‑first operations |
| ManageEngine Endpoint Central | E–M, per‑endpoint tiers (on‑prem / cloud) | S–M MSPs and internal IT |
| Level RMM | M, per-endpoint and per-user pricing | S-M MSPs prioritizing automation and integration |
| Action1 RMM | E–M, per‑endpoint with small free tier | S MSPs and security‑focused IT |
| GoTo Resolve | E–M, per‑technician remote support/RMM | S MSPs and IT helpdesks |
| Auvik | M, per‑device network monitoring | M–L MSPs focused on network visibility |
MSP360 RMM | E–M, per‑endpoint | S MSPs wanting lightweight monitoring |
| Domotz | E–M, per-site monitoring | S–M MSPs needing NOC-style visibility |
If RMM is the nervous system, PSA is your MSP’s operating system. It’s where tickets, time entries, contracts, SLAs, projects, and billing converge, turning day‑to‑day service activity into revenue and insight. A well‑implemented PSA gives you real‑time visibility into workload, profitability by client, and the performance of your service desk.
In 2026, the big divide is between heavyweight, legacy PSA suites and newer chat-first platforms that prioritize usability, automation, and clean integrations over sheer complexity. Look at how each PSA handles ticket workflows, invoicing flexibility, integrations with your RMM and accounting tools, and pricing predictability as you grow your team.
Modern options like DeskDay, HaloPSA, and more position themselves as more intuitive and automation‑driven, while ConnectWise Manage and Datto Autotask remain popular in mature shops that value the broader ecosystem.
| Tool | Indicative pricing & model | Typical MSP segment |
| DeskDay | E–M, per‑user SaaS, PSA + modern service desk | S–M MSPs wanting a modern PSA alternative |
| HaloPSA | M, all‑inclusive per‑user plans, min seats | M–L MSPs needing deep automation |
| ConnectWise PSA (Manage) | M–Ent, per‑user, quote‑based | M–L MSPs standardizing on CW suite |
| Datto Autotask PSA | M, per‑user, quote‑based | M MSPs paired with Datto RMM/BDR |
| SuperOps PSA | M, bundled with RMM per‑tech | S–M MSPs moving to unified PSA+RMM |
| Syncro PSA | E–M, flat per‑tech with unlimited endpoints | S MSPs needing predictable costs |
| Kaseya BMS | E, per‑user SaaS | S–M MSPs in Kaseya stack |
| Rev.io PSA | M–Ent, quote‑based, billing‑heavy | Telecom‑heavy MSPs and service providers |
| ZestMSP | E–M, per‑user SaaS | S MSPs wanting a lightweight PSA |
| BoldDesk | E–M, per-user | S-M MSPs needing simple ticketing |
| Gorelo | E–M, per-user | S-M MSPs needing simple PSA workflows |
| SherpaDesk | E–M, per-user | S-M MSPs needing PSA + asset management |
| Manage Engine | M–Ent, per-user | M–L MSPs looking for Enterprise grade PSA |
Not every MSP wants or needs a full PSA on day one. For smaller teams or internal IT service providers, a dedicated ITSM or ticketing platform can be the fastest way to centralize requests, SLAs, and support communications. These tools focus on incident and request management, knowledge bases, and self‑service portals, with varying levels of ITIL alignment.
The trade‑off is that generic ITSM tools can be less opinionated about MSP‑specific workflows like contract‑driven billing or recurring agreements. When you look at solutions like Zendesk, Freshservice, Jira Service Management, or ServiceNow, evaluate whether you’ll be pairing them with a separate billing layer or PSA, and how much customization overhead you’re willing to absorb. For MSPs that plan to grow into more complex project and financial workflows, a PSA‑first approach with strong ITSM modules can simplify the long term.
| Tool | Indicative pricing & model | Typical MSP segment |
| DeskDay | E–M, per‑user, chat‑first ticketing | S–M MSPs focused on service desk UX |
| Zendesk | E–Ent, tiered per‑agent plans | S–L support teams and MSPs needing omni‑channel |
| Freshservice | E–M, per‑agent ITSM tiers | S–M MSPs and internal IT with ITIL focus |
| Freshdesk | E–M, per‑agent, helpdesk‑oriented | S MSPs and general support desks |
| Jira Service Management | E–M, per‑agent, Atlassian ecosystem | S–M MSPs with dev/IT blend |
| ServiceNow | Ent, quote‑only | L MSPs and global providers |
| ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus | E–M, per‑technician/on‑prem & cloud | S–M MSPs preferring on‑prem options |
| SysAid | E–M, per‑agent, on‑prem/cloud | S–M IT service desks |
| HaloITSM | M, per‑agent, ITIL‑aligned | M MSPs needing mature ITSM |
| Zoho Desk | E–M, per‑agent SaaS | S MSPs and support teams |
| HappyFox Helpdesk | E–M, per-agent | S MSPs needing simple ticketing |
| InvGate Service Desk | E–M, per-agent | S–M MSPs wanting clean UX |
| BMC Helix ITSM | Ent, quote-only | L MSPs with ITIL maturity |
For many clients, their MSP is now their de facto security provider. That means your tool decisions in this category determine not just your protection level, but your liability and your ability to sell higher‑value, security‑centric services. A modern security stack blends endpoint protection/EDR, email security, identity and access controls, and often SIEM/XDR for monitoring and response.
Rather than chasing yet another “all‑in‑one” agent, design around layered coverage and clear responsibility: what runs on every endpoint, what protects cloud and email, what governs access, and what tool your team actually lives in when responding to alerts. Margin also matters here; some security tools are priced aggressively for MSPs, while others are oriented toward enterprise buyers and assume a larger budget and higher ticket price.
| Tool | Indicative pricing & model | Typical MSP segment |
| ESET PROTECT | E–M, per‑endpoint security suites | S–M MSPs needing proven AV/EDR |
| Heimdal XDR | M, per‑endpoint and per‑user XDR | M MSPs offering MDR‑like services |
| Guardz | E–M, per‑tenant MSP bundles | S–M MSPs wanting unified cyber stack |
| PowerDMARC | E–M, per‑domain/tiered SaaS | S–L MSPs managing email security & DMARC |
| Bitdefender GravityZone | E–M, per‑endpoint, MSP console | S–M MSPs delivering endpoint security |
| Sophos Central | M, per‑endpoint/user, bundles | M MSPs needing multi‑layer security |
| SentinelOne | M–Ent, per‑endpoint EDR/XDR | M–L MSPs, MSSPs in high‑risk verticals |
| Webroot Business | E–M, per‑endpoint | S MSPs with lightweight AV needs |
| Huntress | M, per‑endpoint MDR | S–M MSPs layering MDR on top of AV |
| ConnectWise SIEM | M–Ent, per‑endpoint/log volume | M–L MSPs building SOC‑style offerings |
| CrowdStrike Falcon Go | M–Ent, per-endpoint | M–L MSPs wanting enterprise EDR |
| Malwarebytes Nebula | E–M, per-endpoint | S MSPs wanting simple security |
Backup and DR sit at the intersection of risk and revenue. Every MSP advertises “reliable backup,” but real differentiation shows up when there’s an incident: how fast you can recover, how clearly you can demonstrate recovery readiness, and how well your pricing matches the effort required. BDR tools span appliances, software‑only platforms, and cloud‑native services covering servers, endpoints, SaaS, and cloud workloads.
When comparing BDR vendors, look beyond raw storage prices. Factor in recovery workflows, RPO/RTO flexibility, how backup alerts surface in your RMM and PSA, and how licensing behaves when clients add more workloads or move to hybrid environments. A strong BDR stack will let you bundle backup, DR testing, and recovery guarantees into higher‑margin service tiers.
| Tool | Indicative pricing & model | Typical MSP segment |
| Datto Backup & Continuity | M, appliance + per‑device, MSP contracts | M MSPs selling managed continuity |
| Veeam Backup & Replication | M, per‑workload/CPU/subscription | M–L MSPs with virtualization focus |
| Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud | M, per‑workload with security add‑ons | S–M MSPs bundling backup + cyber |
| Arcserve UDP | M, capacity‑based, perpetual/subscription | M MSPs with hybrid on‑prem |
| NAKIVO Backup | E–M, per‑socket/VM/subscription | S–M MSPs needing affordable VM backup |
| Redstor | M, per‑GB cloud backup, MSP console | S–M MSPs centralizing SaaS + endpoint backup |
| MSP360 (CloudBerry) | E–M, per‑workload + cloud storage | S MSPs white‑labeling backup |
| Barracuda Backup | M, appliance + subscription | M MSPs standardizing appliances |
| Unitrends | M, appliance/subscription | M MSPs selling DRaaS |
| IDrive for Business | E, per‑TB subscription | S MSPs and SOHO backup |
| Wasabi Cloud Backup | E, per-TB storage | S–M MSPs wanting cheap cloud BDR |
| Backblaze B2 MSP | E, usage-based | S MSPs with simple cloud backup |
There is a direct line between documentation quality and profitability. Good documentation cuts onboarding time, accelerates time‑to‑resolution, and reduces your dependence on a handful of “hero” technicians. For MSPs, the ideal documentation tool centralizes SOPs, network diagrams, credentials, and client‑specific configurations, with strong search and tight links to tickets and workflows.
Tools like IT Glue and Hudu were built with MSPs at the center, while platforms such as Confluence, Notion, and Document360 often start in general software or internal IT environments and then get adapted to MSP use. When choosing, focus on how easy it is for techs to add and maintain information during real work, not in a separate “documentation day” they’ll never schedule. Integration into your PSA/ITSM and RMM is a major tie‑breaker.
| Tool | Indicative pricing & model | Typical MSP segment |
| IT Glue | M, per‑user/documentation packs | S–L MSPs standardizing SOPs and configs |
| Hudu | E–M, per‑user MSP‑friendly pricing | S–M MSPs as IT Glue alternative |
| ITBoost | E–M, per‑user, often bundled (Kaseya) | S–M MSPs in Kaseya stack |
| Confluence | E–M, per‑user Atlassian SaaS | S–M MSPs for internal docs and runbooks |
| Notion | E–M, per‑user workspace pricing | S MSPs wanting flexible docs + projects |
| Document360 | E–M, per‑project/user tiers | S–M teams building knowledge bases |
| Trainual | E–M, per‑user tiers | S MSPs focusing on SOPs and onboarding |
| Guru | M, per‑user knowledge platform | S–M MSPs centralizing tribal knowledge |
| Helpjuice | M, per‑user knowledge base | M MSPs needing external KB |
| Slab | E–M, per‑user team wiki | S MSPs and product teams |
| Scribe | E–M, per-user | S MSPs generating SOPs automatically |
| Archbee | E–M, per-user | S–M MSPs managing technical docs |
| Docusnap | M, per-device/site | M MSPs needing infra documentation |
Remote access tools are the “hands” of your MSP stack. Even if your RMM includes built‑in remote control, many teams still standardize on a dedicated tool for ad‑hoc sessions, cross‑platform support, or specific security/compliance features. Licensing can be surprisingly impactful here: some tools license by technician, others by endpoint, others by concurrent session.
As you shortlist options like ConnectWise Control, TeamViewer, AnyDesk, Splashtop, LogMeIn Rescue, Zoho Assist, BeyondTrust, and more, map pricing to your support model: how many technicians actively deliver remote sessions at peak times, how many endpoints you must be able to reach instantly, and what your compliance/security requirements look like. Audit logs, MFA enforcement, and approval workflows are increasingly table stakes.
| Tool | Indicative pricing & model | Typical MSP segment |
| ConnectWise Control | E–M, concurrent tech / named tech plans | S–M MSPs, heavy remote support |
| TeamViewer Tensor/Business | E–Ent, per‑user/device, subscription | S–L MSPs and enterprises |
| AnyDesk | E–M, per‑seat/per‑device | S MSPs needing low‑friction remote access |
| Splashtop Business | E–M, per‑user/device bundles | S–M MSPs replacing legacy remote tools |
| LogMeIn Rescue | M–Ent, per‑technician | M–L service desks and MSPs |
| Zoho Assist | E–M, per‑technician tiers | S MSPs and internal IT |
| GoToMyPC / GoTo Resolve RA | E–M, per‑user/host | S support teams and MSPs |
| Dameware Remote Support | E–M, perpetual + maintenance | S–M MSPs on Windows networks |
| BeyondTrust Remote Support | Ent, quote‑only | L MSPs and regulated industries |
| RemotePC | E, per‑device | S MSPs and SOHO remote access |
| RustDesk | E, open source | S MSPs wanting a secure self-hosted RA |
IAM is becoming the control plane for security. Instead of treating MFA as a bolt‑on, MSPs are now leading conversations about Zero Trust, least‑privilege access, and centralized identity governance across on‑prem and SaaS systems. This means your IAM stack must work not only for your own team, but also for dozens of client tenants with very different needs.
As you assess tools like Okta, OneLogin, Microsoft Entra ID, JumpCloud, Duo, CyberArk, Ping, Google Workspace IAM, and ConductorOne, consider three angles: how easily you can manage multi‑tenant environments, how transparent the per‑user pricing is as clients grow, and how well each platform integrates with your broader security and ticketing tools. IAM licenses can quickly become one of your biggest hard costs, but they also enable high‑value, sticky services around compliance, audits, and security baselining.
| Tool | Indicative pricing & model | Typical MSP segment |
| Okta Workforce Identity | M–Ent, per‑user SSO/MFA | M–L MSPs managing many SaaS apps |
| OneLogin | M, per‑user IAM/SSO | S–M MSPs and SaaS‑heavy clients |
| Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) | E–Ent, per‑user tiers (Free–P2) | S–L MSPs with Microsoft 365 tenants |
| JumpCloud | E–M, per‑user device + directory | S–M MSPs building cloud directory |
| CyberArk Identity | Ent, per‑user and per‑privileged account | L MSPs & MSSPs in regulated sectors |
| Ping Identity | Ent, per‑user/transaction | L enterprises and service providers |
| Google Cloud IAM / Workspace | E–M, per‑user via Workspace tiers | S–M MSPs managing Google ecosystems |
| SailPoint | Ent, per‑user identity governance | L MSPs serving enterprises |
| Duo Security (Cisco Duo) | E–M, per‑user MFA | S–M MSPs layering MFA quickly |
| ConductorOne | M, per‑user access governance | S–M MSPs building modern Zero Trust |
| NordLayer | E–M, per-user | S MSPs needing simple IAM + VPN |
With 100 tools on the table, it’s tempting to try to cover every edge case. A better approach is to design a “reference stack” per stage of maturity and then plug individual tools from these lists into those patterns.
For a small MSP, that might mean one modern PSA, one RMM, a lightweight documentation platform, a straightforward BDR solution, and two or three carefully chosen security tools. As you grow into the mid‑market, you can step up to richer automation, more advanced IAM, broader observability, and layered security and backup offerings.
Most importantly, treat your toolset as a living system. Revisit it at least annually as vendor roadmaps, pricing models, and your own service catalogue evolve. By combining category overviews like the ones in this article with pragmatic pricing bands and clear segment fit, you give yourself and your readers a practical way to choose enough tools to win, without drowning in options.
Legend for the table
We evaluated tools based on their relevance to MSP operations in 2026 — including features like ticketing, automation, RMM, security, billing, documentation, and scalability. We also considered ease of use, pricing models, customer feedback, and how well each tool supports growth and operational efficiency.
The list includes tools suited for a range of MSP sizes — from small boutique teams to larger MSP operations. Some are lightweight and budget-friendly, ideal for smaller teams; others offer advanced features and scalability needed by growing or enterprise-scale MSPs. Choose based on your team size and needs.
We review and update the list regularly — typically once per year, with spot updates as significant new tools or versions emerge. That way, the 2026 edition stays current with the evolving MSP ecosystem.
Yes. Where available, we include pricing models, typical license costs, and notes on any hidden expenses or variable fees. This helps you compare tools not just on features, but on total cost of ownership.
Many of the featured tools are modular or configurable, meaning you can enable only the features you need. Even if one tool doesn’t match your workflow 100%, it can often be customized to align closely — or you can combine multiple tools to build a tailored stack.